Here's the uncomfortable truth about salary data: by the time it gets packaged into a clean report, aggregated across industries, smoothed for outliers, and published, it's already a snapshot of the past. The company that paid you $95K two years ago and the company offering $140K today are operating in the same labor market — they've just been reading different benchmarks.
This report is built for 2026. It draws on compensation data from major employers across tech, finance, and professional services — supplemented by publicly disclosed salary bands (Colorado, New York, and California pay transparency laws have made a surprising amount of real data available) and self-reported figures from Levels.fyi, Glassdoor, and LinkedIn Salary Insights.
All figures are in USD. If you're in the UK, Canada, or Australia, the percentile logic — which roles sit above or below market, which variables drive premiums — applies directly. The dollar amounts don't, so I'll flag purchasing power anchors where it helps.
📊 A Note on the Numbers
Salary ranges here represent the 25th–75th percentile for each role/level combination in US major markets (NYC, SF, Seattle, Chicago, Austin). The top of a range isn't the ceiling — it's where 25% of comparable professionals actually land. Location adjustments, equity, and bonuses are addressed separately.
How to Use This Report
This is a pillar document. Think of it as the map — it tells you which territory to explore. Three deep-dive reports cover the detail:
Use this page to calibrate your overall market position, understand the variables driving comp differences, and identify where you sit relative to the total rewards picture. Use the deep-dives to get the specific number for your role.
If you're actively negotiating, pair this with the Salary Negotiation Playbook (C-1-P) — the numbers only matter if you can actually get them on the table.
What Actually Moves Your Number
Before looking at any benchmark, understand what makes the same title worth $90K at one company and $160K at another.
2026 Salary Overview: Cross-Functional Snapshot
25th–75th percentile base salary in USD. Major US markets. See deep-dive articles for full breakdowns by level and specialization.
| Role / Function | Level | Salary Range (Base) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💻 Tech & Engineering | |||
| Software Engineer | Mid | $120K – $165K | +equity at scale cos |
| Software Engineer | Senior | $155K – $215K | Wide range by employer tier |
| AI / ML Engineer | Mid–Senior | $165K – $260K | High demand premium |
| Product Manager | Senior / Principal | $145K – $210K | Bonus often 15–20% |
| Data Scientist | Mid–Senior | $125K – $185K | ML skills push upper end |
| 📣 Marketing, Strategy & HR | |||
| Marketing Manager | Mid–Senior | $85K – $130K | Growth/demand skews higher |
| Director of Marketing | Director | $135K – $190K | Equity common at startups |
| Strategy / BizOps | Associate–Manager | $100K – $160K | Consulting background lifts floor |
| HR Business Partner | Mid–Senior | $90K – $140K | Undervalued vs. scope |
| 🎯 Sales & Revenue Ops | |||
| Account Executive (SaaS) | Mid-Market | $75K – $110K base | OTE $150K–$200K |
| Account Executive (SaaS) | Enterprise | $110K – $160K base | OTE $220K–$320K+ |
| Revenue Operations | Manager | $110K – $155K | Fastest-growing function |
| Customer Success | Enterprise CSM | $85K – $130K | Expansion quota adds upside |
* OTE = On-Target Earnings (base + full commission at quota). Sales comp structures addressed fully in C-3-C3.
Tech & Engineering: What's Driving Comp in 2026
The full breakdown is in C-3-C1. Here's what's changed and what to know before you negotiate.
The post-2022 correction in tech hiring is behind us. By mid-2025, demand had rebounded — selectively. Generalist software engineers at mid-level saw only modest comp recovery. AI/ML, security, and infrastructure specialists saw compensation move to levels that looked anomalous two years ago and are now table stakes.
The employer tier gap has widened. A Senior SWE at a top-10 tech company (Levels.fyi L5/E5 equivalent) earns $250–350K+ in total compensation when you include RSUs. The same person at a well-funded Series C startup might take $185–220K all-in — with meaningful equity upside that may or may not materialize. Neither is "wrong." They're different bets.
📌 The AI premium isn't cooling
Roles requiring hands-on experience with LLMs, RAG systems, fine-tuning, or AI infrastructure command a 20–40% premium over comparable generalist roles. This premium is not a bubble moment — enterprise AI adoption means this demand is structural through at least 2027. If you're adjacent to this space, leaning in is a career finance decision, not just a technical one.
For role-level breakdowns including Staff, Principal, and Distinguished Engineer tiers — plus PM and data science — see the full tech salary report (C-3-C1).
Marketing, Strategy & HR: The Gap Between Title and Value
These functions have the widest comp spread of any group — same title, 2× difference in pay is not rare.
The marketing function has bifurcated. Generalist brand and content roles pay at or below inflation-adjusted 2020 levels at most companies. Performance and growth marketing roles — where you can demonstrate a direct line from your decisions to revenue — are getting priced more like sales. If you're a marketing professional and you can't currently tell the story of how your work drove pipeline or revenue, that's worth fixing before your next comp conversation.
Strategy and BizOps continues to attract professionals coming out of consulting. Entry-level BizOps at a tech company often pays better than a second-year associate consultant position, with the added benefit of having equity and faster scope expansion. The ceiling is real: at the VP/Director level, BizOps leaders at scaled companies routinely earn $200–275K total comp.
HR and people operations remain structurally undercompensated relative to the complexity of the role. The exception: HR Business Partners (HBPs) at large tech companies, where the HRBP — an HR professional embedded with a business unit rather than sitting in a central people team — earns $130–175K and handles work that would require three specialists at a traditional company. Full breakdown in C-3-C2.
Sales & Revenue Ops: Read the OTE, Not Just the Base
Sales comp is constructed differently from other functions. Comparing base salaries is comparing the wrong thing.
In sales, your base salary is usually set to cover living costs and provide stability — the real comp story is the On-Target Earnings (OTE), which includes your commission at full quota attainment. A $90K base AE role with $200K OTE is a very different conversation from a $90K base marketing manager role. This is not complicated math, but it trips up a lot of people when comparing across functions.
Revenue Operations has become the highest-growth function in the go-to-market stack. RevOps professionals — who sit at the intersection of sales, marketing, and customer success, managing the systems, data, and processes that drive revenue — are now commanding comp that reflects their leverage. A strong RevOps Manager at a $50M–$500M ARR company is often more valuable than the person's title implies, and the comp is catching up to that reality.
⚠️ The quota attainment problem
OTE is meaningless if quota is set above what's achievable. Before accepting a sales offer, ask: "What percentage of the team hit quota last year?" A healthy number is 60–70%. Below 50% is a red flag — either the quota model is broken or the product isn't selling. Either way, that OTE is aspirational, not realistic.
Full OTE breakdowns by role, segment, and product type are in C-3-C3.
Beyond Base Salary: The Rest of the Comp Stack
At many companies, especially in tech, base salary is less than half the story.
The Total Comp Math
Always benchmark on total compensation, not just base.
A $140K base role with 20% bonus, $40K in RSUs, and generous benefits can be worth $220K+ annually. A $160K base role with no equity, a thin bonus, and employee-paid health insurance might come out behind. Comparing base-to-base without accounting for the rest is how people accidentally take pay cuts while chasing higher salaries.
Location Adjustments: A Quick Reference
US figures are the baseline. Use these adjusters as a rough guide if you're calibrating for other markets.
| Market | vs. US National Median | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SF Bay Area | +35–45% | Highest base comp globally for most tech roles |
| New York City | +30–40% | Finance premium; strong for non-tech functions |
| Seattle | +25–35% | Amazon, Microsoft, and their ecosystems |
| Austin / Denver | +10–18% | Growing hubs; lower cost of living offsets gap |
| Chicago / Atlanta | +5–12% | Strong for finance, consulting, enterprise SaaS |
| UK (London) | ~60–70% of US equiv. | NHS and pension offset some gap; equity less common |
| Canada (Toronto/Vancouver) | ~55–65% of US equiv. | CAD figures; US remote roles increasingly accessible |
| Australia (Sydney/Melbourne) | ~65–75% of US equiv. | AUD figures; superannuation adds ~11% effective comp |
These are rough adjusters, not precise conversions. Cost of living, tax structure, and benefits systems differ significantly — a UK or AU professional earning the "lower" figure in USD equivalent may be doing better in real purchasing terms after accounting for healthcare, public services, and retirement contributions.
Pay Transparency in 2026: Use It
Laws requiring salary range disclosures in job postings have fundamentally changed how you should research compensation.
Colorado started it in 2021. New York City followed. California expanded requirements. By 2026, a significant share of US employers — including most large companies hiring nationally — either are legally required to post salary ranges or have adopted it as standard practice to remain competitive in attracting candidates.
What this means in practice: before your next negotiation, search LinkedIn and the company's jobs page for the same or similar roles. Even if your state doesn't require disclosure, a company posting for the same position in Colorado or New York will show the range. That's your anchor.
✅ The Transparency Research Checklist
- Search the company's open roles in NY, CO, or CA — even if the job you want is remote
- Check Levels.fyi for tech roles — the self-reported data is now large enough to be reliable
- LinkedIn Salary Insights shows ranges for your exact title and geography
- Glassdoor and Blind have noise, but enough signal to triangulate
- If you're in the interview process: it's now normal — and often legal — to ask for the band before the offer
Knowledge is leverage. The person walking into a negotiation knowing the employer's band is simply better positioned than the person who isn't. This information is available. Go get it.
FAQ
Key Takeaways
What to Do With This Data
Benchmark on total comp, not base. RSUs, bonuses, and benefits can be worth 30–60% of your base. A higher salary offer isn't always a better offer.
Calibrate your level honestly. Your title at a small company may not match the market level. Find the equivalent and benchmark that.
Use pay transparency laws. Post-disclosure data is out there. Use it as your anchor before any negotiation.
If you're below the 25th percentile, act now. This gap compounds annually. A conversation today is worth far more than waiting for your next cycle.
Specialization is comp arbitrage. In-demand skills (AI, RevOps, security, growth) command real premiums that exceed what most managers can justify ignoring.