인사이트 목록으로
workplace networkprofessional networkcareer growthnetworking worksheetnetwork auditadvocacy gapskip-levelworkplace relationshipspeer relationshipscareer developmentprofessional developmentmanaging upremote work

Mapping Your Workplace Network

Workplace Relationships Series How-to Worksheet
Workplace Relationships Series
⚡ How-to Worksheet

Mapping Your Workplace Network:
A 30-Minute Worksheet

Most professionals don't know who's actually in their corner — until they need someone. This worksheet helps you audit your current network, identify the gaps, and leave with a concrete action plan.

⏱ 30 min to complete · 🖊 Best done with pen and paper (or a notes doc) · 🔁 Repeat quarterly
WHAT YOU'LL HAVE AFTER 30 MINUTES:
✓ A map of your current network ✓ Your critical gap list ✓ 3 specific next actions

How to Use This Worksheet

This is a tool for honest self-assessment — not a performance review, not something anyone else will see. The goal is to give you a clear, unsentimental picture of where your professional relationships actually stand, and what to do about it.

Work through the five sections in order. Each one builds on the last. Budget about 30 minutes the first time — it'll take less once you've done it before. The worksheet is most useful when you're starting a new role, approaching a performance cycle, or suspecting that your network isn't serving you as well as it should.

What you need

  • 20–30 minutes uninterrupted
  • A blank doc or paper
  • Your honest instincts — not a polished answer

Best done when

  • Starting a new role or joining a new team
  • 4–6 weeks before performance review season
  • After a reorg or leadership change
  • Any time you feel "invisible" at work
PART 1 OF 5

Map Who's Currently in Your Network

Before you can improve your network, you need an honest picture of what's already there. Use the three tiers below to categorize your current professional relationships.

TIER 1

Inner Circle

People who know your work well and would advocate for you today. Manager, close collaborators, a sponsor if you have one.

3–6

target size

TIER 2

Working Network

Stakeholders, peers in adjacent teams, skip-level contacts. People you interact with on projects and whose work intersects yours.

8–15

target size

TIER 3

Ambient Network

Former colleagues, external contacts, industry peers. People you're not actively working with but want to stay warm with.

15–30

target size

🖊

Exercise 1.1 — Fill in your tiers

In your doc or on paper, write down names in each tier. Don't overthink it — go with your first instinct. You can move people later. Aim to fill at least Tier 1 and Tier 2 completely before moving on.

Tier 1 — Inner Circle (3–6 people)

Name + Role

e.g. "Sarah — my manager"

Tier 2 — Working Network (8–15 people)

Name + Team

e.g. "Marcus — Finance"

Tier 3 — Ambient Network (as many as you have)

Former colleagues, people from previous companies, industry contacts, mentors from earlier in your career…

PART 2 OF 5

Rate the Quality of Each Relationship

Having a name in a tier isn't the same as having a strong relationship. This section helps you assess the actual health of your most important connections — because the goal isn't a long list, it's a functional one.

The four dimensions of relationship quality

V

Visibility — do they know your work?

Could they describe your recent projects and contributions accurately if asked by someone more senior? Or do they know your title and not much more?

T

Trust — would they go to bat for you?

If this person were in a meeting where your name came up favorably or unfavorably, would they advocate for you? Or stay neutral? Or might they not help?

R

Reciprocity — is it mutual?

Do you invest in each other roughly equally? Or is one side consistently doing more — sharing more, helping more, initiating more?

C

Currency — when did you last actually interact?

Relationships that haven't been maintained decay. A relationship that was strong 18 months ago but has had no contact since is an ambient contact at best, not an inner circle one.

🖊

Exercise 2.1 — Rate your Tier 1 relationships

For each person in your Tier 1, score them 1–3 on each dimension (1 = weak, 2 = moderate, 3 = strong). Be honest. There are no right answers, only useful ones.

Name / Role Visibility (V) Trust (T) Reciprocity (R) Currency (C)
e.g. Sarah — Manager _/3 _/3 _/3 _/3
___________________ _/3 _/3 _/3 _/3
___________________ _/3 _/3 _/3 _/3
___________________ _/3 _/3 _/3 _/3
___________________ _/3 _/3 _/3 _/3
___________________ _/3 _/3 _/3 _/3

What to look for: Any dimension scoring 1 on a Tier 1 relationship is a flag. A Visibility score of 1 with your manager means they can't advocate for you effectively. A Trust score of 1 from someone you counted as inner circle means they probably shouldn't be there. A Currency score of 1 means the relationship needs immediate re-investment or a tier downgrade.

PART 3 OF 5

Find the Critical Gaps

The most dangerous gaps in a professional network are the ones you don't notice until you need them. This section surfaces them before they matter.

🔍

Gap Type 1: The Advocacy Gap

The question: If your performance review were happening today, who would speak up for you — unprompted — in the calibration meeting?

If you can't name at least two or three people who would advocate for you in a room you're not in, you have an advocacy gap. This is the gap that affects your rating and your promotion trajectory most directly.

🖊 Write down:

Names of 2–3 people who would advocate for you today. If you can't fill this in, that's your most urgent gap. If your list has only one person (usually your manager), that's also a gap — you're too dependent on a single advocate.

🏢

Gap Type 2: The Function Gap

The question: Are there entire teams or functions whose work touches yours — but where you have no real relationship?

The most common function gaps: Finance (budget cycles), Legal (policy and contracts), Product or Engineering (if you're in an adjacent function), HR (comp and policy), and Operations. If any of these routinely affect your work and you don't know anyone there well, things slow down when you need help.

🖊 Write down:

3 functions that interact with your work. For each: do you have a real relationship with someone there? Circle the ones where the answer is no.

📶

Gap Type 3: The Seniority Gap

The question: Does anyone more senior than your direct manager know who you are and what you do?

If the only person more senior than you who knows your work well is your manager, you're exposed. Reorgs, leadership changes, and promotion decisions all involve people at levels you're not reaching. Visibility at one level above your manager is a minimum for career resilience — at two levels above for senior roles.

🖊 Write down:

Name one person at your skip-level or above who knows your work and would speak positively about it. If you can't, that's a gap. If you can, write down one level higher and try again.

🌐

Gap Type 4: The External Gap

The question: If you were on the job market tomorrow, who outside your current company would take your call, respond to your message, and potentially help?

Internal networks are great for your current role. External networks determine your options when circumstances change — layoffs, reorgs, career pivots, or simply wanting more. In 2026, when job-hopping every 2–3 years is common and layoffs can arrive without warning, the external network is insurance, not a luxury.

🖊 Write down:

5 names from outside your current company — former colleagues, industry contacts, people from previous roles. If you struggle to get to 5, your external network needs attention.

🖊

Exercise 3.1 — Your gap summary

Check every gap that applies to you right now. Be honest — this is private and the only purpose is helping you act on it.

PART 4 OF 5

Answer the Four Diagnostic Questions

These four questions cut to what matters most. Write your actual answers — not the ones that sound good.

Q1

Who is currently telling your story inside the organization?

Your work doesn't speak for itself in most organizations — someone speaks for it. In calibration meetings, in leadership conversations, in hallway moments — who is representing your contributions? Is it your manager? Is it you directly? Is it nobody?

Write your honest answer here. If the answer is "mostly my manager and only my manager," note that as a risk.

Q2

If your manager left tomorrow, what would happen to your visibility?

Manager transitions are one of the most common causes of stalled careers. If your primary advocate disappears and the incoming manager knows nothing about you, you start from zero in terms of credibility and goodwill. How much of your current visibility is manager-dependent?

If you'd lose most of your visibility: who else in the organization knows your work well enough to vouch for you independently?

Q3

Which relationship in your network has the most unrealized potential?

Look back at your tier lists. Is there a person — a senior leader you've met once, a peer in a key function, a former colleague — where the relationship could be stronger with relatively modest investment? These asymmetric opportunities are worth prioritizing over building new relationships from scratch.

Name one person. What would one small investment look like? (A coffee, a Slack message, sharing something useful)

Q4

Is there a relationship in decay that matters — and that you've been avoiding?

We all have them: a colleague we used to work closely with, a mentor who helped us early, a former manager who thought highly of us. The longer the gap goes without contact, the more awkward the re-engagement feels — which extends the gap further. Most people are much more forgiving of a re-engagement after a long silence than we assume. A simple "I realized we haven't caught up in ages — would you be up for a call?" works more often than not.

Name the relationship. Write the first line of the message you'd send to reconnect.

PART 5 OF 5

Build Your Action Plan

A network audit without actions is just a list. This section turns your gaps into specific, scheduled moves.

How to prioritize: the urgency-impact matrix

🔥 Do first (high urgency + high impact)

  • Advocacy gap — less than 2 advocates
  • Performance cycle within 8 weeks
  • Manager transition happening now
  • Promotion case being built

📅 Schedule for next month

  • Function gap where work already intersects
  • Seniority gap — one skip-level relationship
  • Key relationship in decay
  • Unrealized high-potential relationship

🗓 Build into quarterly habits

  • External network warm maintenance
  • Ambient network touches
  • New function relationships
  • Repeat this worksheet

💤 Lower priority for now

  • External gap with stable current role
  • Tier 3 ambient network expansion
  • Industry contacts with no current overlap

🖊 Your 3 Next Actions

Commit to three specific, dated actions before you close this worksheet. Vague intentions don't happen.

ACTION 1
Most urgent gap

Who / What gap does this address?

e.g. "Book a 30-min skip-level with David (seniority gap)"

Specific action

e.g. "Send calendar invite"

By when?

e.g. "This Friday"
ACTION 2
Relationship investment

Who / What gap does this address?

e.g. "Reconnect with Priya from previous company (external gap)"

Specific action

e.g. "Send a LinkedIn message"

By when?

e.g. "End of this week"
ACTION 3
Ongoing habit

What recurring action will you commit to?

e.g. "Send one genuine acknowledgment to a peer each week"

How often?

e.g. "Weekly, on Fridays"

Starting when?

e.g. "Next Monday"

Set a recurring reminder

Do This Worksheet Every Quarter

Networks decay faster than most people realize. A relationship that felt strong in January can drift significantly by June if there's been no real contact. The biggest returns come from catching that drift before it becomes a gap. Add a quarterly calendar event — 30 minutes, recurring — to repeat this audit.

Q1

Jan — Network reset after performance cycle

Q2

Apr — Mid-year check before any mid-year reviews

Q3

Jul — Prep for year-end cycle starting in Q4

Q4

Oct — Pre-review push; identify any urgent gaps

Quick-Reference: Network Health Signals

After completing the worksheet, use this reference to benchmark where you stand. Healthy networks don't need to be large — they need to be functional.

Network health at a glance

Strong network
3+ advocates across functions · skip-level visibility · 5+ warm external contacts · regular peer investment · Tier 1 relationships maintained monthly
Adequate network
Manager as primary advocate + 1–2 others · some cross-functional contacts · limited but warm external contacts · Tier 1 relationships maintained quarterly
Thin network
Manager as only real advocate · few cross-functional contacts · external network mostly cold · relationships mostly reactive (only connect when needed)
At-risk network
No clear advocates · limited cross-functional visibility · no meaningful external network · performance cycle approaching · no recent senior visibility

Read the Full Workplace Relationships Series

🗺

Workplace Relationships Series · Pillar

The Complete Guide to Workplace Relationships

The full overview: tiers, managing up, skip-level visibility, conflict

🧭

Workplace Relationships Series

How to Work With Any Manager

Includes the Tier 1 relationship that matters most

🤝

Workplace Relationships Series

Compete Less, Collaborate More

Why collaborative peers become your most durable network asset

Workplace Relationships Series

How to Handle Workplace Conflict Without the Drama

What to do when a key relationship needs repair